Clara Gomez v. Citizens Property Insurance Corporation
This text of Clara Gomez v. Citizens Property Insurance Corporation (Clara Gomez v. Citizens Property Insurance Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed September 4, 2024. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D23-0328 Lower Tribunal No. 20-9152 ________________
Clara Gomez, Appellant,
vs.
Citizens Property Insurance Corporation, Appellee.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Beatrice Butchko, Judge.
Giasi Law, P.A., and Melissa A. Giasi (Tampa) and Erin M. Berger (Tampa), for appellant.
Dean, Ringers, Morgan & Lawton, P.A., and Jessica C. Conner (Orlando), for appellee.
Before FERNANDEZ, MILLER and BOKOR, JJ.
BOKOR, J. Although the insured met her initial burden to show that the insured
property suffered a loss, she failed to provide any evidence to rebut the
insurance company’s record evidence regarding the applicability of an
exclusion from coverage for preexisting damage. See Kokhan v. Auto Club
Ins. Co. of Fla., 297 So. 3d 570, 572 (Fla. 4th DCA 2020) (“[A]n insured
claiming under an all-risks policy has the burden of proving that the insured
property suffered a loss while the policy was in effect. The burden then shifts
to the insurer to prove that the cause of the loss was excluded from coverage
under the policy's terms.” (quotation omitted)); Deshazior v. Safepoint Ins.
Co., 305 So. 3d 752, 755 (Fla. 3d DCA 2020) (“Once the movant produces
competent evidence in support of summary judgment, the opposing party
must come forward with counterevidence sufficient to reveal a genuine issue
of material fact.” (quotations omitted)); Gonzalez v. Citizens Prop. Ins. Corp.,
273 So. 3d 1031, 1037–38 (Fla. 3d DCA 2019) (affirming summary judgment
for insurer where insured proffered only speculative and conclusory evidence
insufficient to create genuine issue of material fact against insurer’s affidavits
attesting that inspection failed to reveal damages covered by policy).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Clara Gomez v. Citizens Property Insurance Corporation, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clara-gomez-v-citizens-property-insurance-corporation-fladistctapp-2024.