Clapp v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Clapp v. State

19 A.D.3d 1113, 796 N.Y.S.2d 281, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6463

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 10, 2005

DocketClaim No. 107042; Claim No. 107111; Appeal No. 1

StatusPublished

This text of 19 A.D.3d 1113 (Clapp v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Clapp v. State, 19 A.D.3d 1113, 796 N.Y.S.2d 281, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6463 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeals from an order of the Court of Claims (Richard E. Sise, J.), entered April 27, 2004. The order, among other things, granted those parts of the motions of claimants seeking partial summary judgment on the issue of liability on their respective Labor Law § 240 (1) claims and denied defendant’s respective cross motions seeking summary judgment dismissing the claims under Labor Law § 240 (1) and § 241 (6).

It is hereby ordered that said appeals be and the same hereby are unanimously dismissed without costs (see Hughes v Nussbaumer, Clarke & Velzy, 140 AD2d 988 [1988]; Chase Manhattan Bank v Roberts & Roberts, 63 AD2d 566, 567 [1978]; see also CPLR 5501 [a] [1]). Present—Pigott, Jr., RJ., Green, Gorski, Pine and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeals from an order of the Court of Claims (Richard E. Sise, J.), entered April 27, 2004. The order, among other things, granted those parts of the motions of claimants seeking partial summary judgment on the issue of liability on their respective Labor Law § 240 (1) claims and denied defendant’s respective cross motions seeking summary judgment dismissing the claims under Labor Law § 240 (1) and § 241 (6).

It is hereby ordered that said appeals be and the same hereby are unanimously dismissed without costs (see Hughes v Nussbaumer, Clarke & Velzy, 140 AD2d 988 [1988]; Chase Manhattan Bank v Roberts & Roberts, 63 AD2d 566, 567 [1978]; see also CPLR 5501 [a] [1]). Present—Pigott, Jr., RJ., Green, Gorski, Pine and Lawton, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

19 A.D.3d 1113, 796 N.Y.S.2d 281, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6463, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clapp-v-state-nyappdiv-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack