Clapp v. Norton
106 Mass. 33
Opinion
The plan was not evidence, and it does not appear that it was admitted as such. As a means of enabling a witness to explain the position of different points, locations, walks and fences as to which he testifies, such a sketch may be referred to and shown to the jury. It appears to have been used merely as such. It went to the jury without objection at the time, and thus all objection on that point was waived.
Exceptions overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Clapp v. Norton, 106 Mass. 33 (Mass. 1870).
106 Mass. 33 (Clapp v. Norton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
McKarren v. Boston & Northern Street Railway Co.
80 N.E. 477 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1907)
Sheppard v. Yocum
10 Or. 402 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1882)
Paine v. Woods
108 Mass. 160 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1871)