Clapp v. Norton
This text of 106 Mass. 33 (Clapp v. Norton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The plan was not evidence, and it does not appear that it was admitted as such. As a means of enabling a witness to explain the position of different points, locations, walks and fences as to which he testifies, such a sketch may be referred to and shown to the jury. It appears to have been used merely as such. It went to the jury without objection at the time, and thus all objection on that point was waived.
Exceptions overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
106 Mass. 33, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clapp-v-norton-mass-1870.