Clapp v. Hext
6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 344
This text of 6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 344 (Clapp v. Hext) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Chancery of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Clapp v. Hext, 6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 344 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1728).
Opinion
Bill of complaint of Elizabeth and Mary Clapp, infant daughters of Gilson and Margaret Clapp, by Gilson Clapp, their next friend, against Hugh Hext, executor of Sarah Fenwick, to inquire why the plaintiffs have not been tended their legacies under the will of Sarah Fenwick, dated Jan. 26, 1726 (1727). Hume pro Quer.
(Bundle 1721-1735).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 344, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clapp-v-hext-ctchansc-1728.