Clanton v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Clanton v. State

533 S.W.3d 245

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 7, 2017·No. No. ED 105218·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Dwayne Clanton appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. There is no clear error here. The “motion in support” filed on appeal, which was taken with the case, is denied. We affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Dwayne Clanton appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. There is no clear error here. The “motion in support” filed on appeal, which was taken with the case, is denied. We affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Clanton v. State, 533 S.W.3d 245 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

533 S.W.3d 245 (Clanton v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.