Clanton v. State

533 S.W.3d 245
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedNovember 7, 2017
DocketNo. ED 105218
StatusPublished

This text of 533 S.W.3d 245 (Clanton v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Clanton v. State, 533 S.W.3d 245 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Dwayne Clanton appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. There is no clear error here. The “motion in support” filed on appeal, which was taken with the case, is denied. We affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
533 S.W.3d 245, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clanton-v-state-moctapp-2017.