Clandorf v. General Motors Corp.

49 A.D.2d 745

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered March 26, 1975, in favor of defendants upon dismissal of the complaint at the close of a jury trial, on the ground that plaintiff Wanda T. Clandorf was contributorily negligent as a matter of law. Judgment reversed, on the law, and new trial granted, with costs to abide the event (Wartels v County Asphalt, 29 NY2d 372; Provenzo v Sam, 23 NY2d 256, 260-261; Rossman v La Grega, 28 NY2d 300, 305). Gulotta, P. J., Rabin, Martuscello, Latham and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Clandorf v. General Motors Corp., 49 A.D.2d 745 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

49 A.D.2d 745 (Clandorf v. General Motors Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Provenzo v. Sam
244 N.E.2d 26 (New York Court of Appeals, 1968)
Rossman v. La Grega
270 N.E.2d 313 (New York Court of Appeals, 1971)
Wartels v. County Asphalt, Inc.
278 N.E.2d 627 (New York Court of Appeals, 1972)