Clancy v. Reasbeck

526 So. 2d 1085, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1509, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2760, 1988 WL 65168
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 29, 1988·No. No. 88-0979·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner seeks a writ of prohibition to prohibit respondent from presiding in further proceedings in the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit in the case of Clancy v. Clancy, No. 87-00374 CP. We grant the petition for writ of prohibition upon authority of Fruehe v. Honorable James M. Reasbeck, 525 So.2d 471 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988).

We are content that respondent will comply with the directions of this Court without the necessity for the issuance of the peremptory writ.

Petition for Writ of Prohibition is

GRANTED.

GLICKSTEIN, WALDEN and GUNTHER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Clancy v. Reasbeck, 526 So. 2d 1085, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1509, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2760, 1988 WL 65168 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

526 So. 2d 1085 (Clancy v. Reasbeck) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fruehe v. Reasbeck
525 So. 2d 471 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)