Clancy v. Reasbeck

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Clancy v. Reasbeck

526 So. 2d 1085, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1509, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2760, 1988 WL 65168

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 29, 1988

DocketNo. 88-0979

StatusPublished

This text of 526 So. 2d 1085 (Clancy v. Reasbeck) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Clancy v. Reasbeck, 526 So. 2d 1085, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1509, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2760, 1988 WL 65168 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner seeks a writ of prohibition to prohibit respondent from presiding in further proceedings in the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit in the case of Clancy v. Clancy, No. 87-00374 CP. We grant the petition for writ of prohibition upon authority of Fruehe v. Honorable James M. Reasbeck, 525 So.2d 471 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988).

We are content that respondent will comply with the directions of this Court without the necessity for the issuance of the peremptory writ.

Petition for Writ of Prohibition is

GRANTED.

GLICKSTEIN, WALDEN and GUNTHER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI