Clancy v. Perales

103 A.D.2d 1029, 478 N.Y.S.2d 818, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19730

Opinion

— Determination unanimously annulled and petition granted, without costs. Memorandum: Respondents conceded on oral argument and in their briefs that, on the particular facts presented here, 18 NYCRR 352.29 (h) is inapplicable and that, therefore, the relief requested should be granted. (Article 78 proceeding transferred by order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Ricotta, J.) Present — Hancock, Jr., J. P., Callahan, Doerr, O’Donnell and Moule, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Clancy v. Perales, 103 A.D.2d 1029, 478 N.Y.S.2d 818, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19730 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

103 A.D.2d 1029 (Clancy v. Perales) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.