Clancy v. Clancy

506 P.2d 417, 89 Nev. 84
CourtNevada Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 1, 1973
DocketNo. 7031
StatusPublished

This text of 506 P.2d 417 (Clancy v. Clancy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Clancy v. Clancy, 506 P.2d 417, 89 Nev. 84 (Neb. 1973).

Opinion

OPINION

Per Curiam:

This is an appeal from that portion of a decree of divorce which divided the community property between the parties. We have reviewed the record presented and are unable to discern any abuse of discretion by the trial judge in dividing the community property as he did. Herzog v. Herzog, 69 Nev. 286, 249 P.2d 533 (1952).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Herzog v. Herzog
249 P.2d 533 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1952)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
506 P.2d 417, 89 Nev. 84, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clancy-v-clancy-nev-1973.