Clampitt v. Nixon

93 S.W.3d 714, 2002 Mo. LEXIS 140, 2002 WL 31863822
Supreme Court of Missouri·Decided December 24, 2002·No. SC 84215·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Clampitt was convicted in St. Francois County and placed on probation. While on probation, he committed. additional offenses. He was placed in jail for a probation violation. His probation was revoked, and he began serving his sentence in the department of corrections. Ultimately, he was convicted of the additional offenses in Washington County and given concurrent sentences with credit for “jail time.” He concluded the “jail-time” credit was not properly computed and filed this declaratory judgment action. The trial court entered summary judgment denying Clam-pitt any relief.

The trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Clampitt v. Nixon, 93 S.W.3d 714, 2002 Mo. LEXIS 140, 2002 WL 31863822 (Mo. 2002).

93 S.W.3d 714 (Clampitt v. Nixon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Rutter
93 S.W.3d 714 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 2002)