Clamente v. Valente
236 A.D. 850
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 15, 1932·Published
Opinion
Judgment reversed on the law and new trial granted, costs to appellants to abide the event, upon the ground that it was error to exclude the conversation preceding the making of the mortgage in support [851] of the defense of usury. (Houghton v. Burden, 228 U. S. 161, 169; Mudgett v. Goler, 18 Hun, 302; Von Haus v. Soule, 146 App. Div. 731, 734; Orvis v. Curtiss, 157 N. Y. 657, 660; Austin v. Fuller, 12 Barb. 360, 363.) Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Scudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Clamente v. Valente, 236 A.D. 850 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1932).
236 A.D. 850 (Clamente v. Valente) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Houghton v. Burden
228 U.S. 161 (Supreme Court, 1913)
Orvis v. . Curtiss
52 N.E. 690 (New York Court of Appeals, 1899)
Haus v. Soule
146 A.D. 731 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1911)
Austin v. Fuller
12 Barb. 360 (New York Supreme Court, 1852)