Clamageran v. Degruy

2 Mart. (N.S.) 156
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedFebruary 15, 1824
StatusPublished

This text of 2 Mart. (N.S.) 156 (Clamageran v. Degruy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Clamageran v. Degruy, 2 Mart. (N.S.) 156 (La. 1824).

Opinion

Mathew, J.

delivered the opinion of the court. In this case it appears that the appellee, who was voted for as syndic of the estate of the insolvents, is not a creditor; and on that ground, the appellant opposses the homologation of the proceedings, which took place, by the creditors in the matter above stated.

In this respect, it is similar to the case of Enet vs. his creditors, reported in 4 Martin, 307: and we are unable to discover an facts established by the record, or any law on the subject enacted subsequent to the decision of that case which authorizes or requires a different judgment in the present

It is therefore ordered, adjudged, and decreed, that the judgment of the parish court be annulled, avoided, and reversed, and it is further ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the case be remanded to the court below, with [157]*157instructions to the judge of said court, to order an other meeting of the creditors of said Baulos and Cavaroc, for the purpose of proceeding to he nomination of a syndic, or syndics, according to law.

Cuvillier for the plaintiff, Grymes for the defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 Mart. (N.S.) 156, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clamageran-v-degruy-la-1824.