Clam Lake Township v. Department of Licensing & Regulatory Affairs
This text of Clam Lake Township v. Department of Licensing & Regulatory Affairs (Clam Lake Township v. Department of Licensing & Regulatory Affairs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
July 3, 2017 Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice
Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack 151800(60)(65) David F. Viviano Richard H. Bernstein Joan L. Larsen CLAM LAKE TOWNSHIP, and Kurtis T. Wilder, Justices HARING CHARTER TOWNSHIP, Appellants, SC: 151800 v COA: 325350 Wexford CC: 2014-025391-AA DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS / STATE BOUNDARY COMMISSION, TERIDEE, LLC, and CITY OF CADILLAC, Appellees. _________________________________________/
On order of the Chief Justice, the appellants’ motions to file a post-argument supplemental brief and a post-argument reply are GRANTED. The supplemental brief and reply, as well as the answers thereto, are accepted for filing.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. July 3, 2017 Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Clam Lake Township v. Department of Licensing & Regulatory Affairs, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clam-lake-township-v-department-of-licensing-regulatory-affairs-mich-2017.