Clairvoyant v. State
This text of Clairvoyant v. State (Clairvoyant v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
RICHARDSON CLAIRVOYANT, § § No. 151, 2021 Defendant Below, § Appellant, § Court Below—Superior Court § of the State of Delaware v. § § Cr. ID Nos. 1809007630, STATE OF DELAWARE, § 1909009085 (K) § Plaintiff Below, § Appellee. §
Submitted: June 29, 2021 Decided: July 13, 2021
ORDER
It appears to the Court that, on June 14, 2021, the Chief Deputy Clerk issued a
notice, by certified mail, directing the appellant, Richardson Clairvoyant, to show cause
why his appeal should not be dismissed for his failure to pay the Supreme Court filing
fee or to file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Postal records show that
Clairvoyant received the notice to show cause on June 17, 2021. A timely response to
the notice to show cause was due on or before June 28, 2021. To date, Clairvoyant has
not paid the Supreme Court filing fee, filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis, or
responded to the notice to show cause. Dismissal of this action is therefore deemed to
be unopposed. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, under Supreme Court Rules 3(b)(2)
and 29(b), that this appeal is DISMISSED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Collins J. Seitz, Jr. Chief Justice
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Clairvoyant v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clairvoyant-v-state-del-2021.