Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Clairvin v. State

Clairvin v. State

56 So. 3d 854, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 1076, 2011 WL 335314
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 4, 2011
DocketNo. 5D10-725
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 56 So. 3d 854 (Clairvin v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Clairvin v. State, 56 So. 3d 854, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 1076, 2011 WL 335314 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Morton v. State, 689 So.2d 259, 264 (Fla.1997), receded from in part on other grounds, Rodriguez v. State, 753 So.2d 29, 47 (Fla.2000) (where witness gives both favorable and unfavorable testimony, party calling witness should usually be permitted to impeach witness with prior inconsistent statement; statement should be truly inconsistent and caution should be exercised in permitting impeachment of witness who has given favorable testimony but simply fails to recall every detail unless witness appears to be fabricating).

MONACO, C.J., EVANDER and JACOBUS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Clairvin v. State
162 So. 3d 192 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2015)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
56 So. 3d 854, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 1076, 2011 WL 335314, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clairvin-v-state-fladistctapp-2011.