Clairol Inc. v. Carlton Drug, Inc.
This text of 27 A.D.2d 652 (Clairol Inc. v. Carlton Drug, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment unanimously reversed, on the law and the facts, with $50 costs and disbursements to plaintiff-appellant, and judgment directed in favor of the plaintiff. The issues of law and fact are substantially the same as in Clairol Inc. v. Peekskill Thrift Drug Corp. (25 A D 2d 496) decided subsequent to the entry of the judgment herein. We there held the retail sale of uncartoned bottles of plaintiff’s product with instructional material unlike the instructions enclosed in plaintiff’s individually cartoned bottles for retail sale to be in violation of section 368-d of the General Business Law. Settle findings, conclusions and judgment in conformity herewith. Concur — Botein, P. J., Stevens, Tilzer and McNally, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
27 A.D.2d 652, 278 N.Y.S.2d 177, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4972, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clairol-inc-v-carlton-drug-inc-nyappdiv-1967.