Clairmy v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims·Decided July 21, 2026·No. 21-0690V·Unpublished

Opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 21-0690V

BASE-MARTHE CLAIRMY, Chief Special Master Corcoran

Petitioner, Filed: June 5, 2026 v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent.

Laura Levenberg, Muller Brazil, LLP, Dresher, PA, for Petitioner.

Dorian Hurley, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

DECISION ON JOINT STIPULATION1

On January 12, 2021, Base-Marthe Clairmy filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2 (the “Vaccine Act”).3 Petitioner alleged that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”), a defined Table Injury, after receiving influenza (“flu”) and tetanus (“Tdap”) vaccines in her left deltoid on October 23, 2019. Second Amended Petition at 1, ¶¶ 2, 18; Stipulation, filed June 4, 2026, ¶¶ 1-2, 4. Petitioner further alleged that she received the vaccine within the United States, that she suffered the residual

1 Because this Decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action taken in this case, it must be made

publicly accessible and will be posted on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, and/or at https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/uscourts/national/cofc, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2018) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease

of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2018). 3 On January 6 and July 8, 2022, Petitioner filed amended petitions with additional detail (particularly

regarding the multiple vaccines she received) and medical records citations. ECF Nos. 17, 22. effects of her SIRVA for more than six months, and that neither she nor any other party has filed a civil case or received compensation for her SIRVA, alleged to be vaccine- related. Petition at ¶¶ 2, 14-16; Stipulation at ¶¶ 3-5. “Respondent denies that [P]etitioner sustained a SIRVA Table injury; denies that the flu and/or Tdap vaccines caused [P]etitioner’s alleged SIRVA, or any other injury; and denies that her current condition is a sequela of a vaccine-related injury.” Stipulation at ¶ 6.

Nevertheless, on June 4, 2026, the parties filed the attached joint stipulation, stating that a decision should be entered awarding compensation. I find the stipulation reasonable and adopt it as my decision awarding damages, on the terms set forth therein.

Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Stipulation, I award the following compensation:

A lump sum of $65,000.00, to be paid through an ACH deposit to Petitioner’s counsel’s IOLTA account for prompt disbursement to Petitioner. Stipulation at ¶ 8. This amount represents compensation for all items of damages that would be available under Section 15(a). Id.

I approve the requested amount for Petitioner’s compensation. In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.4

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master

4 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice

renouncing the right to seek review.

2 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

BASE-MARTHE CLAIRMY,

Petitioner, No. 21-690V v. Chief Special Master Corcoran ECF SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,

STIPULATION

The parties hereby stipulate to the following matters:

1. Base-Marthe Clairmy (“petitioner”) filed a petition for vaccine compensation under

the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10 to 34 (the “Vaccine

Program”). The petition seeks compensation for injuries allegedly related to petitioner’s receipt

of an influenza (“flu”) and/or tetanus-diphtheria-acellular-pertussis (“Tdap”), which vaccines are

contained in the Vaccine Injury Table (the “Table”), 42 C.F.R. § 100.3(a).

2. Petitioner received the flu and Tdap vaccines on October 23, 2019.

3. The vaccines were administered within the United States.

4. Petitioner alleges that she suffered from a shoulder injury related to vaccine

administration (“SIRVA”) within the time period set forth in the Table following administration

of the vaccines. Petitioner further alleges that she experienced the residual effects of this

condition for more than six months.

5. Petitioner represents that there has been no prior award or settlement of a civil action

for damages on petitioner’s behalf because of the alleged injury. 6. Respondent denies that petitioner sustained a SIRVA Table injury; denies that the flu

and/or Tdap vaccines caused petitioner’s alleged SIRVA, or any other injury; and denies that her

current condition is a sequela of a vaccine-related injury.

7. Maintaining their above-stated positions, the parties nevertheless now agree that the

issues between them shall be settled and that a decision should be entered awarding the

compensation described in paragraph 8 of this Stipulation.

8. As soon as practicable after an entry of judgment reflecting a decision consistent with

the terms of this Stipulation, and after petitioner has filed an election to receive compensation

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-21(a)(1), the Secretary of Health and Human Services will issue

the following vaccine compensation payment for all damages that would be available under 42

U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a):

A lump sum of $65,000.00 to be paid through an ACH deposit to petitioner’s counsel’s IOLTA account for prompt disbursement to petitioner.

9. As soon as practicable after the entry of judgment on entitlement in this case, and after

petitioner has filed both a proper and timely election to receive compensation pursuant to 42

U.S.C. § 300aa-21(a)(1), and an application, the parties will submit to further proceedings before

the special master to award reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs incurred in proceeding upon this

petition.

10. Petitioner and petitioner’s attorney represent that compensation to be provided

pursuant to this Stipulation is not for any items or services for which the Program is not

primarily liable under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(g), to the extent that payment has been made or can

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Clairmy v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, (uscfc 2026).

Clairmy v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (Clairmy v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 300a
42 U.S.C. § 300a
§ 3501
44 U.S.C. § 3501
§ 1396
42 U.S.C. § 1396