Clair v. Sun Bank National Ass'n
610 So. 2d 35, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 12472, 1992 WL 353306
This text of 610 So. 2d 35 (Clair v. Sun Bank National Ass'n) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Clair v. Sun Bank National Ass'n, 610 So. 2d 35, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 12472, 1992 WL 353306 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).
Opinion
We affirm with the exception that credit should have been allowed against the deficiency judgment for the following related items:
Fairlead assemblies and installation $16,540.00
Fairlead mounting hardware 1,368.50.
Upon remand, the judgment shall be corrected to reflect these credits.
AFFIRMED BUT REMANDED FOR CORRECTION.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
610 So. 2d 35, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 12472, 1992 WL 353306, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clair-v-sun-bank-national-assn-fladistctapp-1992.