Clair v. McGehee
22 Tex. 5
Opinion
The court did not err in dismissing the petition for certiorari, upon motion:—because it does not state what was, or was not, in proof, as the foundation of the judgment rendered by the justice. As facts may have existed, which might have authorized such a judgment, on such claim, against both [7] husband and wife, we must presume in favor of the judgment, in the absence of any statement, as to what facts were in proof. (Milburn vs. Walker, 11 Tex. Rep. 330; Robinson vs. Lakey, 19 Tex. Rep.)
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Clair v. McGehee, 22 Tex. 5 (Tex. 1858).
22 Tex. 5 (Clair v. McGehee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
C. A. Elmen Co. v. Godsey
166 S.W. 1178 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1914)
Lutterloh v. McIlhenny Co.
11 S.W. 1063 (Texas Supreme Court, 1889)
Peet, Yale & Bowling v. Hereford Bros.
1 White & W. 502 (Texas Commission of Appeals, 1880)
Hayes v. Bass
1 White & W. 14 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1877)
Caldwell v. Brown
43 Tex. 216 (Texas Supreme Court, 1875)
Smith v. Allen
28 Tex. 497 (Texas Supreme Court, 1866)