Clair v. Doe

Fourth Circuit

Clair v. Doe

670 F. App'x 774

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 21, 2016·No. No. 16-1585·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Charles Clair appeals the district court’s orders granting the motion to dismiss his amended complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Clair v. Doe, No. 8:14-cv-00713-PWG, 2016 WL 374097 (D. Md. Apr. 29, 2016; Feb. 1, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Charles Clair appeals the district court’s orders granting the motion to dismiss his amended complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Clair v. Doe, No. 8:14-cv-00713-PWG, 2016 WL 374097 (D. Md. Apr. 29, 2016; Feb. 1, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Clair v. Doe, 670 F. App'x 774 (4th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

670 F. App'x 774 (Clair v. Doe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related