Clair v. Doe
This text of 670 F. App'x 774 (Clair v. Doe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Charles Clair appeals the district court’s orders granting the motion to dismiss his amended complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Clair v. Doe, No. 8:14-cv-00713-PWG, 2016 WL 374097 (D. Md. Apr. 29, 2016; Feb. 1, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
670 F. App'x 774, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clair-v-doe-ca4-2016.