Claim of Zoller v. Barnard, Porter, Remington & Fowler

1 A.D.2d 721, 146 N.Y.S.2d 759, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3739
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 23, 1955
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 1 A.D.2d 721 (Claim of Zoller v. Barnard, Porter, Remington & Fowler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Claim of Zoller v. Barnard, Porter, Remington & Fowler, 1 A.D.2d 721, 146 N.Y.S.2d 759, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3739 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1955).

Opinion

Appeal by claimant from a decision and award of the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Claimant was injured in an industrial accident. At a hearing before the board, the attorney for the employer and carrier conceded that claimant was then permanently totally disabled. The question before the board was whether this disability was caused by the industrial accident. One physician attributed claimant’s entire disability to cerebral arteriosclerosis and gave an opinion that none of his disability was due to the industrial accident. Another physician testified that claimant did receive a head injury in the industrial accident which either caused his total disability or aggravated the' arteriosclerotic changes in his brain. The board found that claimant was permanently partially disabled as the result of the industrial accident and fixed the amount of compensation accordingly. Claimant argues that there is no competent medical testimony that only a portion of his mental difficulties resulted from the industrial accident and that the board was required to find either that there was a total permanent disability as the result of the industrial accident or that none of the disability was caused thereby. The board was not required to accept or reject the whole of each medical opinion. It had the right to weigh the conflicting opinions in the light of the record as a whole and to determine that only a portion of claimant’s disability was due to the industrial accident. There is substantial evidence to support this determination. Decision and award unanimously affirmed, without costs. Present — Foster, P. J., Bergan, Coon, Halpern and Zeller, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Manitowoc County v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human Relations
276 N.W.2d 755 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1979)
Bradbury v. General Foods Corporation
218 A.2d 673 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1966)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 A.D.2d 721, 146 N.Y.S.2d 759, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3739, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-zoller-v-barnard-porter-remington-fowler-nyappdiv-1955.