Claim of Ziskind v. Green Thumb Spray Corp.

207 A.D.2d 933, 616 N.Y.S.2d 265, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8809
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 15, 1994·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

—Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed April 9, 1993.

We affirm. Claimant did not appeal from the Board’s substantive decision finding no causal relationship for a claimed neck injury but instead chose to appeal only from the decision [934] denying reconsideration of that determination. It is well settled that the Board’s decision to deny an application for reconsideration may not be disturbed unless it was arbitrary and capricious or an abuse of discretion. Here, we find no evidence that the Board’s decision is irrational, especially in the absence of any showing that there are additional facts or new information which were previously unavailable for the Board’s consideration.

Cardona, P. J., Mikoll, Crew III, Weiss and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Claim of Ziskind v. Green Thumb Spray Corp., 207 A.D.2d 933, 616 N.Y.S.2d 265, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8809 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

207 A.D.2d 933 (Claim of Ziskind v. Green Thumb Spray Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Claim of Howell v. Langie Fuel Service
241 A.D.2d 568 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
Claim of Saczawa v. United Parcel Service
236 A.D.2d 656 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
Claim of Dukes v. Capitol Formation, Inc.
213 A.D.2d 756 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)