Claim of Zimmerman v. Capitol Milk Bars, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Zimmerman v. Capitol Milk Bars, Inc.

263 A.D. 919, 32 N.Y.S.2d 445, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7365

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 21, 1942

StatusPublished

This text of 263 A.D. 919 (Claim of Zimmerman v. Capitol Milk Bars, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Claim of Zimmerman v. Capitol Milk Bars, Inc., 263 A.D. 919, 32 N.Y.S.2d 445, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7365 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1942).

Pincite

Opinion

This is an appeal by claimant from a decision of the State Industrial Board disallowing a claim for workmen’s compensation. Claimant, employed as a purchasing agent by the employer-respondent, alleges that on January 20, 1940, while engaged in the regular course of his employment, he sustained accidental injuries which resulted in acute coronary occlusion. The State Industrial Board disallowed the claim on the ground that the alleged accidental injuries sustained by claimant did not arise out of and in the course of his employment and that there was no causal relation between the acute coronary occlusion and the industrial accident. A question of fact was presented and there is ample competent medical evidence to warrant the finding of the Board. Decision of the State Industrial Board affirmed and the claim for compensation disallowed. Hill, P. J., Crapser, Bliss, Heffernan and Schenck, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This is an appeal by claimant from a decision of the State Industrial Board disallowing a claim for workmen’s compensation. Claimant, employed as a purchasing agent by the employer-respondent, alleges that on January 20, 1940, while engaged in the regular course of his employment, he sustained accidental injuries which resulted in acute coronary occlusion. The State Industrial Board disallowed the claim on the ground that the alleged accidental injuries sustained by claimant did not arise out of and in the course of his employment and that there was no causal relation between the acute coronary occlusion and the industrial accident. A question of fact was presented and there is ample competent medical evidence to warrant the finding of the Board. Decision of the State Industrial Board affirmed and the claim for compensation disallowed. Hill, P. J., Crapser, Bliss, Heffernan and Schenck, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

263 A.D. 919, 32 N.Y.S.2d 445, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7365, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-zimmerman-v-capitol-milk-bars-inc-nyappdiv-1942.