Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Claim of Zaro v. Zaro Tourist & Steamship Ticket Agency, Inc.

Claim of Zaro v. Zaro Tourist & Steamship Ticket Agency, Inc.

222 A.D. 700
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 15, 1927
StatusPublished

This text of 222 A.D. 700 (Claim of Zaro v. Zaro Tourist & Steamship Ticket Agency, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Claim of Zaro v. Zaro Tourist & Steamship Ticket Agency, Inc., 222 A.D. 700 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1927).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The carrier having been given an opportunity on the argument to procure if possible representation by the employer on this- appeal and having been unable to do so the appeal must be dismissed. (See Matter of Hammele v. McMahon, 220 App. Div. 60.) Cochrane, P. J., Van Kirk, Hinman, McCann and Whitmyer, JJ., concur. Appeal dismissed, with ten dollars costs against the insurance carrier to the State Industrial Board.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Claim of Hammele v. McMahon
220 A.D. 60 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1927)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
222 A.D. 700, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-zaro-v-zaro-tourist-steamship-ticket-agency-inc-nyappdiv-1927.