Claim of Wood v. Tupper Lake Chemical Co.
178 A.D. 942
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 15, 1917·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Award affirmed, on the authority of Dale v. Huai Construction Co. (175 App. Div. 284); Matter of Dale v. Saunders Bros. (218 N. Y. 59); Hartell v. Simonson & Son Co. (Id. 345). All concurred, except Woodward, J., who dissented.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Claim of Wood v. Tupper Lake Chemical Co., 178 A.D. 942 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1917).
178 A.D. 942 (Claim of Wood v. Tupper Lake Chemical Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Claim of Peck v. Tassell & Fairbanks
193 A.D. 604 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1920)