Claim of Wischman v. Berrick-Meyer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Wischman v. Berrick-Meyer

259 A.D. 766, 18 N.Y.S.2d 301, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6582

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 13, 1940

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 259 A.D. 766 (Claim of Wischman v. Berrick-Meyer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Claim of Wischman v. Berrick-Meyer, 259 A.D. 766, 18 N.Y.S.2d 301, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6582 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the State Industrial Board, dated October 18, 1939, made under the Workmen’s Compensation Law, which reversed an award of compensation previously granted by a referee and dismissed the claim on the ground that the claimant did not receive an accidental injury arising out of and in the course of his employment. Claimant was employed as a janitor and resided across the street from his place of employment. He went home for supper and while crossing the street on his return to the apartment to look after the fires, was struck by an automobile and killed. Decision unanimously affirmed, without costs. Present — Hill, P. J., Crapser, Bliss, Heffernan and Foster, JJ. [See post, p. 941.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a decision of the State Industrial Board, dated October 18, 1939, made under the Workmen’s Compensation Law, which reversed an award of compensation previously granted by a referee and dismissed the claim on the ground that the claimant did not receive an accidental injury arising out of and in the course of his employment. Claimant was employed as a janitor and resided across the street from his place of employment. He went home for supper and while crossing the street on his return to the apartment to look after the fires, was struck by an automobile and killed. Decision unanimously affirmed, without costs. Present — Hill, P. J., Crapser, Bliss, Heffernan and Foster, JJ. [See post, p. 941.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

259 A.D. 766, 18 N.Y.S.2d 301, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6582, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-wischman-v-berrick-meyer-nyappdiv-1940.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack