Claim of Wintermantel v. Riverside Ice Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Wintermantel v. Riverside Ice Co.

243 A.D. 843

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 15, 1935·Published

Opinion

The claimant fell from an ice wagon of his employer and sustained serious injury to an arm, and also to his head. Since that time he has suffered from headaches and dizziness, and epileptic fits and fainting spells, and has been unable to work since that time. Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, McNamee, Crapser and Heffernan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The claimant fell from an ice wagon of his employer and sustained serious injury to an arm, and also to his head. Since that time he has suffered from headaches and dizziness, and epileptic fits and fainting spells, and has been unable to work since that time. Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, McNamee, Crapser and Heffernan, JJ.

Claim of Wintermantel v. Riverside Ice Co., 243 A.D. 843 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

243 A.D. 843 (Claim of Wintermantel v. Riverside Ice Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.