Claim of Weygant v. Walter Kroll, Inc.

286 A.D.2d 818, 730 N.Y.S.2d 262, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8635
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 20, 2001·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

—Carpinello, J. Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed May 19, 2000, which ruled that the Workers’ Compensation Law Judge properly exercised his discretion in directing depositions of medical witnesses.

Here, as in Matter of Bathrick v New York State Dept. of Transp. (278 AD2d 704), the appeal has been rendered moot as a result of the rescission by the full Workers’ Compensation Board of the Board panel decision on appeal and we find no exception to the mootness doctrine (see, Matter of Hearst Corp. v Clyne, 50 NY2d 707).

Cardona, P. J., Mercure, Spain and Rose, JJ., concur. Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Claim of Weygant v. Walter Kroll, Inc., 286 A.D.2d 818, 730 N.Y.S.2d 262, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8635 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

286 A.D.2d 818 (Claim of Weygant v. Walter Kroll, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matter of Canadanovic v. Central Absorption of LIC, Inc.
2021 NY Slip Op 02442 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)
Matter of Carey v. Westchester County Dept. of Corr.
2019 NY Slip Op 3116 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)
Claim of Alund v. Malt River Brewing Co.
15 A.D.3d 746 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)