Claim of Werner v. Slonimsky

257 A.D. 1089, 14 N.Y.S.2d 682, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9210

Opinion

Claimant has appealed from the decision of the State Industrial Board denying Ms claim for compensation. It is the contention of claimant that on March 4,1937, while he was operating a pressing machine on Ms employer’s [1090]*1090premises and while closing the machine, that his foot slipped, that his body was shaken and that he felt pain in the chest. At the conclusion of the testimony the referee held that according to the overwhelming weight of the credible evidence claimant did not sustain an accidental injury within the meaning of the Workmen’s Compensation Law. The State Industrial Board on review affirmed that ruling. There is evidence to sustain the finding. Decision unanimously affirmed. Present — Hill, P. J., Crapser, Bliss, HeSernan and Schenek, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Claim of Werner v. Slonimsky, 257 A.D. 1089, 14 N.Y.S.2d 682, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9210 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

257 A.D. 1089 (Claim of Werner v. Slonimsky) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.