Claim of Weinstein v. Eisenberg & Weinstein, Inc.
This text of 262 A.D. 1058 (Claim of Weinstein v. Eisenberg & Weinstein, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by the carrier from an award to an executive officer of the insured. The award was made under the provisions of subdivision 6 of section 54 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law. The policies were issued annually and each ran for one year. The first was issued by the carrier, effective April 2, 1936, to April 2, 1937. The claimant elected not to be insured. The second policy was effective from April 2, 1937, to April 2, 1938, and the third was dated on the latter date for one year. The claimant did not elect to be excluded from either of the last two policies. He was injured during the period covered by the third policy. He is entitled to compensation for his injury. (Matter of Gassman v. S & A Service Corporation, 256 App. Div. 868; affd., 281 N. Y. 706; (Matter of Leef v. Dainty Kiddie Cap Co., Inc., 251 App. Div. 764.) Award affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. Hill, P. J., Bliss, Heffernan and Foster, JJ., concur; Crapser, J., dissents and votes to reverse the award and to dismiss the claim.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
262 A.D. 1058, 30 N.Y.S.2d 298, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7205, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-weinstein-v-eisenberg-weinstein-inc-nyappdiv-1941.