Claim of Watson v. Vogue Metalcraft, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Watson v. Vogue Metalcraft, Inc.

91 A.D.2d 747, 457 N.Y.S.2d 983, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19633

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 16, 1982

StatusPublished

This text of 91 A.D.2d 747 (Claim of Watson v. Vogue Metalcraft, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Claim of Watson v. Vogue Metalcraft, Inc., 91 A.D.2d 747, 457 N.Y.S.2d 983, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19633 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed January 11, 1982, which awarded death benefits to the deceased employee’s mother. Decedent sustained fatal injuries during an explosion at her place of employment on July 24, 1980. The sole issue raised on appeal is the propriety of the board’s finding that the mother of the deceased is a dependent within the meaning of the Workers’ Compensation Law. In this regard, a review of the record amply supports the board’s determination (see Matter of Hernandez v Frangella Bros., 64 AD2d 734; Matter of Markidis v American Airlines, 21 AD2d 927). The decision should accordingly be affirmed. Decision affirmed, with costs to the Workers’ Compensation Board. Mahoney, P. J., Sweeney, Kane, Casey and Levine, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed January 11, 1982, which awarded death benefits to the deceased employee’s mother. Decedent sustained fatal injuries during an explosion at her place of employment on July 24, 1980. The sole issue raised on appeal is the propriety of the board’s finding that the mother of the deceased is a dependent within the meaning of the Workers’ Compensation Law. In this regard, a review of the record amply supports the board’s determination (see Matter of Hernandez v Frangella Bros., 64 AD2d 734; Matter of Markidis v American Airlines, 21 AD2d 927). The decision should accordingly be affirmed. Decision affirmed, with costs to the Workers’ Compensation Board. Mahoney, P. J., Sweeney, Kane, Casey and Levine, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

91 A.D.2d 747, 457 N.Y.S.2d 983, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19633, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-watson-v-vogue-metalcraft-inc-nyappdiv-1982.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack