Claim of Watson v. Graphic Management System

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Watson v. Graphic Management System

96 A.D.2d 619, 464 N.Y.S.2d 590, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19165

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 7, 1983

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 96 A.D.2d 619 (Claim of Watson v. Graphic Management System) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Claim of Watson v. Graphic Management System, 96 A.D.2d 619, 464 N.Y.S.2d 590, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19165 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed July 28,1982. Claimant’s wife, the decedent herein, was secretary and treasurer of a closely held corporation with its principal office in New York City. Claimant is the president of the corporation. Decedent performed most of her duties for the corporation, such as keeping the books and preparing checks for claimant’s signature, in a room set aside for that purpose at their home in South Salem, New York. The room contained a typewriter, ledger books and the corporate checkbook. On occasion, she had to go to the New York City office for an audit of the books. On the day in question, two men entered the home in South Salem and raped and murdered her and another woman present. Thereafter, the assailants were apprehended and convicted. When arrested, the assailants had three corporate checks signed by decedent. Claimant also testified that his wife had telephoned the office concerning the payment of a corporate bill at about noon on the day of her death and that she had prepared a check on that day. The board found that decedent’s death arose out of and in the course of her employment and awarded death benefits. This appeal ensued. We should not disturb the board’s findings of fact, including the ultimate fact of “arising out of and in the course of employment”, unless erroneous in law and regardless of whether conflicting evidence is available (Matter of Young v Henry M. Young, Inc., 56 AD2d 941, 942). Considering the instant record in its entirety, we conclude that there is substantial evidence to sustain the board’s findings and decision. Accordingly, there should be an affirmance (see Matter of Hille v Gerald Records, 23 NY2d 135; Matter of Levi v Interstate Photo Supply Corp., 46 AD2d 951). Decision affirmed, with costs to the Workers’ Compensation Board against the employer and its insurance carrier. Mahoney, P. J., Sweeney, Main, Casey and Weiss, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed July 28,1982. Claimant’s wife, the decedent herein, was secretary and treasurer of a closely held corporation with its principal office in New York City. Claimant is the president of the corporation. Decedent performed most of her duties for the corporation, such as keeping the books and preparing checks for claimant’s signature, in a room set aside for that purpose at their home in South Salem, New York. The room contained a typewriter, ledger books and the corporate checkbook. On occasion, she had to go to the New York City office for an audit of the books. On the day in question, two men entered the home in South Salem and raped and murdered her and another woman present. Thereafter, the assailants were apprehended and convicted. When arrested, the assailants had three corporate checks signed by decedent. Claimant also testified that his wife had telephoned the office concerning the payment of a corporate bill at about noon on the day of her death and that she had prepared a check on that day. The board found that decedent’s death arose out of and in the course of her employment and awarded death benefits. This appeal ensued. We should not disturb the board’s findings of fact, including the ultimate fact of “arising out of and in the course of employment”, unless erroneous in law and regardless of whether conflicting evidence is available (Matter of Young v Henry M. Young, Inc., 56 AD2d 941, 942). Considering the instant record in its entirety, we conclude that there is substantial evidence to sustain the board’s findings and decision. Accordingly, there should be an affirmance (see Matter of Hille v Gerald Records, 23 NY2d 135; Matter of Levi v Interstate Photo Supply Corp., 46 AD2d 951). Decision affirmed, with costs to the Workers’ Compensation Board against the employer and its insurance carrier. Mahoney, P. J., Sweeney, Main, Casey and Weiss, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

96 A.D.2d 619, 464 N.Y.S.2d 590, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19165, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-watson-v-graphic-management-system-nyappdiv-1983.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack