Claim of Watson v. American Can Co.

221 N.E.2d 463, 18 N.Y.2d 758, 274 N.Y.S.2d 683, 1966 N.Y. LEXIS 1072
New York Court of Appeals·Decided October 18, 1966·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Order affirmed, with costs. Under the circumstances of this case, the accident arose out of and in the course of the employment. No opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Jndges Fuld, Vau Voorhis, Burke, Scileppi, Bergan and Keating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Claim of Watson v. American Can Co., 221 N.E.2d 463, 18 N.Y.2d 758, 274 N.Y.S.2d 683, 1966 N.Y. LEXIS 1072 (N.Y. 1966).

221 N.E.2d 463 (Claim of Watson v. American Can Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Curley v. Layton
128 A.D.3d 884 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
Claim of Dandola v. New York City Department of Correction
244 A.D.2d 729 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
Claim of Neacosia v. New York Power Authority
649 N.E.2d 1188 (New York Court of Appeals, 1995)
Claim of Neacosia v. New York Power Authority
205 A.D.2d 945 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
Toyota of Pensacola v. Maines
558 So. 2d 1072 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Corraro's Case
403 N.E.2d 388 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1980)
Dependents of Pacheco v. Orchids of Hawaii
502 P.2d 1399 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1972)