Claim of Warak v. Certain-teed Products Corp.
240 A.D. 931
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 15, 1933·Published
Opinion
Award affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. The doctors’ bills are allowed on the authority of Matter of Weisberg v. Alexander Bros. Furniture Co. (235 App. Div. 57). Hill, P. J., Rhodes, Bliss and Heffernan, JJ., concur; McNamee, J., concurs on the ground that the medical treatment furnished by the employer was inadequate.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Claim of Warak v. Certain-teed Products Corp., 240 A.D. 931 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).
240 A.D. 931 (Claim of Warak v. Certain-teed Products Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Claim of Weisberg v. Alexander Bros. Furniture Co.
235 A.D. 57 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1932)