Claim of Walters v. Goldberger-Raabin Co.
236 A.D. 867
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 15, 1932·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Award reversed and claim remitted with costs against the State Industrial Board to abide the event, on the ground that the medical testimony in support of the award is in the form of a verified report or affidavit which is disputed by the oral testimony of a physician called by the appellants. (Matter of Magna v. Hegeman Harris Co., 258 N. Y. 82.) Van Kirk, P. J., Hinman, Hill, Rhodes and Crapser, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Claim of Walters v. Goldberger-Raabin Co., 236 A.D. 867 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1932).
236 A.D. 867 (Claim of Walters v. Goldberger-Raabin Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Claim of Bochkarev v. Henry's Landscaping Service
10 A.D.2d 398 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1960)