Claim of Walters v. Goldberger-Raabin Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Walters v. Goldberger-Raabin Co.

236 A.D. 867

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 15, 1932

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 236 A.D. 867 (Claim of Walters v. Goldberger-Raabin Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Claim of Walters v. Goldberger-Raabin Co., 236 A.D. 867 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

Award reversed and claim remitted with costs against the State Industrial Board to abide the event, on the ground that the medical testimony in support of the award is in the form of a verified report or affidavit which is disputed by the oral testimony of a physician called by the appellants. (Matter of Magna v. Hegeman Harris Co., 258 N. Y. 82.) Van Kirk, P. J., Hinman, Hill, Rhodes and Crapser, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Award reversed and claim remitted with costs against the State Industrial Board to abide the event, on the ground that the medical testimony in support of the award is in the form of a verified report or affidavit which is disputed by the oral testimony of a physician called by the appellants. (Matter of Magna v. Hegeman Harris Co., 258 N. Y. 82.) Van Kirk, P. J., Hinman, Hill, Rhodes and Crapser, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

236 A.D. 867, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-walters-v-goldberger-raabin-co-nyappdiv-1932.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack