Claim of Wall v. Robins Conveying Belt Co.

243 A.D. 824
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 15, 1935·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

Award affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board.

Hill, P. J. Rhodes and Crapser, JJ., concur; MeNamee, J., dissents and votes to reverse the award and to remit, on the ground that the Board determined the earning capacity of the claimant pursuant to subdivision 2 of section 14, Workmen’s Compensation Law, and resorted to an artificial basis of the earnings of other persons. This was unfair and unreasonable within the letter and spirit of subdivision 3 of that section, because it did not take into consideration the claimant’s own previous earnings. It appears in the record that in the previous year claimant worked nine and one-half months, earning $1,104, and the method pursued by the Board wholly disregards these very substantial earnings for more than three-quarters of the previous year. Bliss, J., dissents, with an opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Claim of Wall v. Robins Conveying Belt Co., 243 A.D. 824 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

243 A.D. 824 (Claim of Wall v. Robins Conveying Belt Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Claim of Aronstein v. Trojan Hat Co.
245 A.D. 151 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1935)