Claim of Walker v. Twin Industries Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Walker v. Twin Industries Corp.

101 A.D.2d 667, 475 N.Y.S.2d 582, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18205

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 26, 1984

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 101 A.D.2d 667 (Claim of Walker v. Twin Industries Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Claim of Walker v. Twin Industries Corp., 101 A.D.2d 667, 475 N.Y.S.2d 582, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18205 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed February 2, 1983. H In the decision under review, the board found that claimant has a permanent-partial disability. Claimant appeals, contending that the board’s determination of partial disability is not supported by substantial evidence. Rather, claimant asserts that the only conclusion supported by the record is that he has a total permanent disability. 11 We must affirm. A review of the record reveals that the evidence before the board as to the degree [668]*668of disability consisted solely of conflicting medical testimony and, thus, presented no more than an issue of fact for the board to determine (Matter of Floyd, v Fisher Body Div. of Gen. Motors Corp., 39 AD2d 988). The board’s determination is supported by substantial evidence. ¶ Decision affirmed, without costs. Mahoney, P. J., Kane, Casey, Weiss and Levine, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed February 2, 1983. H In the decision under review, the board found that claimant has a permanent-partial disability. Claimant appeals, contending that the board’s determination of partial disability is not supported by substantial evidence. Rather, claimant asserts that the only conclusion supported by the record is that he has a total permanent disability. 11 We must affirm. A review of the record reveals that the evidence before the board as to the degree [668]*668of disability consisted solely of conflicting medical testimony and, thus, presented no more than an issue of fact for the board to determine (Matter of Floyd, v Fisher Body Div. of Gen. Motors Corp., 39 AD2d 988). The board’s determination is supported by substantial evidence. ¶ Decision affirmed, without costs. Mahoney, P. J., Kane, Casey, Weiss and Levine, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

101 A.D.2d 667, 475 N.Y.S.2d 582, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18205, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-walker-v-twin-industries-corp-nyappdiv-1984.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack