Claim of Walker v. Narolewski
164 N.E.2d 726, 7 N.Y.2d 835, 196 N.Y.S.2d 709, 1959 N.Y. LEXIS 925
This text of 164 N.E.2d 726 (Claim of Walker v. Narolewski) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Claim of Walker v. Narolewski, 164 N.E.2d 726, 7 N.Y.2d 835, 196 N.Y.S.2d 709, 1959 N.Y. LEXIS 925 (N.Y. 1959).
Opinion
Order affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board; no opinion.
Concur: Chief Judge Conway and Judges Desmond, Dye, Fuld, Feoessel and Bueke. Judge Van Voobhis dissents and votes to dismiss the claim for the reasons stated by Justice Heblihy in his dissenting memorandum in the Appellate Division.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Claim of Roher v. Cherry Grove Hotel & Restaurant
20 A.D.2d 593 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1963)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
164 N.E.2d 726, 7 N.Y.2d 835, 196 N.Y.S.2d 709, 1959 N.Y. LEXIS 925, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-walker-v-narolewski-ny-1959.