Claim of Walker v. Narolewski

164 N.E.2d 726, 7 N.Y.2d 835, 196 N.Y.S.2d 709, 1959 N.Y. LEXIS 925
New York Court of Appeals·Decided December 30, 1959·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board; no opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge Conway and Judges Desmond, Dye, Fuld, Feoessel and Bueke. Judge Van Voobhis dissents and votes to dismiss the claim for the reasons stated by Justice Heblihy in his dissenting memorandum in the Appellate Division.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Claim of Walker v. Narolewski, 164 N.E.2d 726, 7 N.Y.2d 835, 196 N.Y.S.2d 709, 1959 N.Y. LEXIS 925 (N.Y. 1959).

164 N.E.2d 726 (Claim of Walker v. Narolewski) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Claim of Roher v. Cherry Grove Hotel & Restaurant
20 A.D.2d 593 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1963)