Claim of Vogel v. Clifford

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Vogel v. Clifford

245 A.D. 874

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 15, 1935

StatusPublished

This text of 245 A.D. 874 (Claim of Vogel v. Clifford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Claim of Vogel v. Clifford, 245 A.D. 874 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

Claimant was a scrubwoman and janitress. The sole question is the wage rate. Award is for nine dollars a week. The employer and the carrier object that the facts do not sustain the finding of thirteen dollars and fifty cents as the weekly wage rate. Claimant, a janitress and scrubwoman, worked for two employers. She received five dollars a week from appellant for two days’ work, and lodging, board and' twenty dollars a month from the other employer. There also was proof that thirteen dollars and fifty cents was a reasonable weekly wage for persons engaged in a like employment in the locality where claimant worked. Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, Crapser, Bliss and Heffernan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Claimant was a scrubwoman and janitress. The sole question is the wage rate. Award is for nine dollars a week. The employer and the carrier object that the facts do not sustain the finding of thirteen dollars and fifty cents as the weekly wage rate. Claimant, a janitress and scrubwoman, worked for two employers. She received five dollars a week from appellant for two days’ work, and lodging, board and' twenty dollars a month from the other employer. There also was proof that thirteen dollars and fifty cents was a reasonable weekly wage for persons engaged in a like employment in the locality where claimant worked. Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, Crapser, Bliss and Heffernan, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

245 A.D. 874, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-vogel-v-clifford-nyappdiv-1935.