Claim of Vines v. Lazar Motors, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Vines v. Lazar Motors, Inc.

277 A.D.2d 1083

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 29, 1950

StatusPublished

This text of 277 A.D.2d 1083 (Claim of Vines v. Lazar Motors, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Claim of Vines v. Lazar Motors, Inc., 277 A.D.2d 1083 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1950).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by employer and its insurance carrier from an award of the Workmen’s Compensation Board. The only contention of appellants is that the evidence does not support a finding of occupational disease or a finding of causal relationship. Claimant was employed as a parts manager and gas station [1084]*1084attendant, and his duties required him to be on his feet the entire day except for about one hour. He became disabled as a result of varicosities of both lower extremities which the board has found to be an occupational disease contracted due to the nature of his employment. There is medical testimony to support this finding. The issue is one of fact. Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Present — Foster, P. J., Heffernan, Brewster, Bergan and Coon, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by employer and its insurance carrier from an award of the Workmen’s Compensation Board. The only contention of appellants is that the evidence does not support a finding of occupational disease or a finding of causal relationship. Claimant was employed as a parts manager and gas station [1084]*1084attendant, and his duties required him to be on his feet the entire day except for about one hour. He became disabled as a result of varicosities of both lower extremities which the board has found to be an occupational disease contracted due to the nature of his employment. There is medical testimony to support this finding. The issue is one of fact. Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Present — Foster, P. J., Heffernan, Brewster, Bergan and Coon, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

277 A.D.2d 1083, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-vines-v-lazar-motors-inc-nyappdiv-1950.