Claim of Vecchio v. Combined Construction Co.
This text of 231 A.D. 771 (Claim of Vecchio v. Combined Construction Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Award affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. All concur, except Hinman, Acting P. J., who dissents and votes for reversal, on the ground that the claimant retains at least fifty per cent of vision; that it is a good eye but will not focus with the other eye; that he has not sustained a compensable [772]*772total loss of vision of the eye as awarded but a loss of only fifty per cent of such vision; that his loss of binocular vision (pertaining to the use of both eyes at once) was not a compensable loss recognized at the time of the accident. Present — Hinman, Acting P. J., Davis, Whitmyer, Hill and Hasbrouck, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
231 A.D. 771, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-vecchio-v-combined-construction-co-nyappdiv-1930.