Claim of Van De Water v. Heany

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Van De Water v. Heany

272 A.D.2d 1090

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 19, 1947

StatusPublished

This text of 272 A.D.2d 1090 (Claim of Van De Water v. Heany) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Claim of Van De Water v. Heany, 272 A.D.2d 1090 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1947).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by employer and its insurance carrier from an award of death benefits in favor of the widow and three minor children of Leo J. Van De Water,¡ deceased. The Workmen’s Compensation Board found that on February 14, 1944, Leo J. Van De Water sustained accidental injuries which resulted in his death on May 26, 1944, and that such injuries were sustained in the course of his employment and arose out of the employment. The board found that due to the work which the decedent was performing at that time he sustained accidental injuries in the nature of coronary occlusion and died as the result of such injuries. The evidence sustains the finding of the hoard. Award affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Hill, P. J., Heffernan, Foster and Russell, JJ., concur; Brewster, J7, taking no part. [See 273 App Div. 828.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by employer and its insurance carrier from an award of death benefits in favor of the widow and three minor children of Leo J. Van De Water,¡ deceased. The Workmen’s Compensation Board found that on February 14, 1944, Leo J. Van De Water sustained accidental injuries which resulted in his death on May 26, 1944, and that such injuries were sustained in the course of his employment and arose out of the employment. The board found that due to the work which the decedent was performing at that time he sustained accidental injuries in the nature of coronary occlusion and died as the result of such injuries. The evidence sustains the finding of the hoard. Award affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Hill, P. J., Heffernan, Foster and Russell, JJ., concur; Brewster, J7, taking no part. [See 273 App Div. 828.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

272 A.D.2d 1090, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-van-de-water-v-heany-nyappdiv-1947.