Claim of Van Curen v. Collins
This text of 245 A.D. 885 (Claim of Van Curen v. Collins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The only question presented by the record is whether Luke J. Collins was claimant’s employer. On April 3, 1933, claimant while engaged in loading timber on a railroad car sustained accidental injuries. In the employer’s first report of injury he admitted that he was claimant’s employer. In a supplemental report he made the same admission. Claimant testified unequivocally that Collins employed him. There is evidence to sustain the finding of the Industrial Board that Collins was the employer. Award unanimously affirmed with costs to the State Industrial Board. Present — Hill, P. J., McNamee, Crapser, Bliss and Heffernan, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
245 A.D. 885, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-van-curen-v-collins-nyappdiv-1935.