Claim of Urbancik v. Roseman Estates, Inc.

11 A.D.2d 554, 199 N.Y.S.2d 775, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10187
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 5, 1960·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Appeal by an employer and its insurance carrier from a decision and award of the Workmen’s Compensation Board made upon a finding that an accidental injury to claimant’s foot acted upon a pre-existing vascular condition to cause gangrene which ultimately necessitated a leg amputation. Appellants deny the occurrence of the accident, found to have occurred when a couch which claimant and his son-in-law were carrying slipped from claimant’s grasp and struck his foot. Each of these persons testified to the accident and their credibility was for the board. We find nothing inherently improbable in the evidence as to accident and under the circumstances the board was not bound to reject it because certain hospital records contained no history of trauma. Appellants attack, also, the finding of causal relation. The operating surgeon testified to causation and the board was, of course, entitled to accept his testimony as against that of appellants’ experts. Decision and award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Present — Bergan, P. J., Coon, Gibson, Herlihy and Reynolds, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Claim of Urbancik v. Roseman Estates, Inc., 11 A.D.2d 554, 199 N.Y.S.2d 775, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10187 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1960).

11 A.D.2d 554 (Claim of Urbancik v. Roseman Estates, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Miller v. Industrial Commission of Arizona
561 P.2d 773 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1977)
Whitaker v. Sunset Queens, Inc.
49 A.D.2d 998 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1975)