Claim of Uletas v. Elliott
209 N.E.2d 120, 16 N.Y.2d 642, 261 N.Y.S.2d 79, 1965 N.Y. LEXIS 1335
This text of 209 N.E.2d 120 (Claim of Uletas v. Elliott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Claim of Uletas v. Elliott, 209 N.E.2d 120, 16 N.Y.2d 642, 261 N.Y.S.2d 79, 1965 N.Y. LEXIS 1335 (N.Y. 1965).
Opinion
[644]*644Order affirmed, with costs to respondent Workmen’s Compensation Board; no opinion.
Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Burke and Scileppi. Judge Van Voorhis dissents and votes to reverse and to dismiss the claim on the dissenting memorandum of Justice Herlihy in the first appeal to the Appellate Division (18 A D 2d 849). Taking no part: Judge Bergan.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
209 N.E.2d 120, 16 N.Y.2d 642, 261 N.Y.S.2d 79, 1965 N.Y. LEXIS 1335, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-uletas-v-elliott-ny-1965.