Claim of Tumarkin v. Care Cleaners, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Tumarkin v. Care Cleaners, Inc.

60 A.D.2d 709, 400 N.Y.S.2d 594, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14732

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 22, 1977

StatusPublished

This text of 60 A.D.2d 709 (Claim of Tumarkin v. Care Cleaners, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Claim of Tumarkin v. Care Cleaners, Inc., 60 A.D.2d 709, 400 N.Y.S.2d 594, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14732 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeals from decisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Board, filed April 8, 1976, as amended by decisions filed January 20, 1977 and March 7, 1977, which found that the claimant had a continuing causally related disability subsequent to February 9, 1974 and awarded benefits for reduced earnings. The question in this case was whether or not the claimant’s loss of earnings was due solely to economic conditions. The board found: "based on the testimony and the medical evidence, that the claimant’s loss of earning capacity [is] due to her causally related disability.” The record contains substantial evidence to support this finding. Decisions affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board against the employer and its insurance carrier. Koreman, P. J., Greenblott, Sweeney, Mikoll and Herlihy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeals from decisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Board, filed April 8, 1976, as amended by decisions filed January 20, 1977 and March 7, 1977, which found that the claimant had a continuing causally related disability subsequent to February 9, 1974 and awarded benefits for reduced earnings. The question in this case was whether or not the claimant’s loss of earnings was due solely to economic conditions. The board found: "based on the testimony and the medical evidence, that the claimant’s loss of earning capacity [is] due to her causally related disability.” The record contains substantial evidence to support this finding. Decisions affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board against the employer and its insurance carrier. Koreman, P. J., Greenblott, Sweeney, Mikoll and Herlihy, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

60 A.D.2d 709, 400 N.Y.S.2d 594, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14732, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-tumarkin-v-care-cleaners-inc-nyappdiv-1977.