Claim of Trillas v. Weimet Film Co.

New York Court of Appeals

Claim of Trillas v. Weimet Film Co.

118 N.E.2d 599, 306 N.Y. 779, 1954 N.Y. LEXIS 1127

New York Court of Appeals·Decided February 25, 1954·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Order affirmed, with costs, and order absolute directed against appellants upon the stipulation and matter remitted to Workmen’s Compensation Board with directions to make an award in favor of claimant.

Concur: Lewis, Ch. J., Conway, Dye and Fboessel, JJ. Desmond, Fuld and Van Voobhis, JJ., dissent and vote to reverse the order and to reinstate the determination of the Workmen’s Compensation Board dismissing the claim, upon the ground that there was substantial evidence to sustain the board’s decision that claimant suffered at most an eye injury, where, from a compensation standpoint, he was totally and permanently blind before the accident.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order affirmed, with costs, and order absolute directed against appellants upon the stipulation and matter remitted to Workmen’s Compensation Board with directions to make an award in favor of claimant.

Concur: Lewis, Ch. J., Conway, Dye and Fboessel, JJ. Desmond, Fuld and Van Voobhis, JJ., dissent and vote to reverse the order and to reinstate the determination of the Workmen’s Compensation Board dismissing the claim, upon the ground that there was substantial evidence to sustain the board’s decision that claimant suffered at most an eye injury, where, from a compensation standpoint, he was totally and permanently blind before the accident.

Claim of Trillas v. Weimet Film Co., 118 N.E.2d 599, 306 N.Y. 779, 1954 N.Y. LEXIS 1127 (N.Y. 1954).

Pincite

118 N.E.2d 599 (Claim of Trillas v. Weimet Film Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related