Claim of Torres v. Laurel Hill Nursery
476 N.E.2d 1005, 64 N.Y.2d 895, 487 N.Y.S.2d 560, 1985 N.Y. LEXIS 14139
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum of the Appellate Division (98 AD2d ,904).
Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Jasen, Meyer, Simons, Kaye and Alexander.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Claim of Torres v. Laurel Hill Nursery, 476 N.E.2d 1005, 64 N.Y.2d 895, 487 N.Y.S.2d 560, 1985 N.Y. LEXIS 14139 (N.Y. 1985).
476 N.E.2d 1005 (Claim of Torres v. Laurel Hill Nursery) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Claim of Umanzor v. General Telecom
9 A.D.3d 591 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Kingsley v. Leija
260 A.D.2d 761 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
Leo Polehn Orchards v. Hernandez
857 P.2d 213 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1993)
Claim of Tyrell v. Bouyea Baking Co.
194 A.D.2d 832 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
Oates v. State
157 Misc. 2d 618 (New York State Court of Claims, 1993)
Claim of Mizugami v. Sharin West Overseas, Inc.
183 A.D.2d 962 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)