Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Claim of Toomey v. Village of Blasdell

Claim of Toomey v. Village of Blasdell

171 A.D. 975, 156 N.Y.S. 1148
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 15, 1915
StatusPublished

This text of 171 A.D. 975 (Claim of Toomey v. Village of Blasdell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Claim of Toomey v. Village of Blasdell, 171 A.D. 975, 156 N.Y.S. 1148 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1915).

Opinion

Order reversed, with costs, and matter remitted to the Special Term for the appointment of commissioners of appraisal, upon the authority of Matter of Staub v. Village of Mamaroneck (165 App. Div. 755). A11 concurred, except Kruse, P. J., who dissented upon the grounds stated in his dissenting memorandum in the case of Matter of Lester v. Village of Blasdell (167 App. Div. 947).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re the Claim of Staub against the Village of Mamaroneck
165 A.D. 755 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1915)
Claim of Lester v. Village of Blasdell
167 A.D. 947 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1915)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
171 A.D. 975, 156 N.Y.S. 1148, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-toomey-v-village-of-blasdell-nyappdiv-1915.