Claim of Toomey v. Village of Blasdell
171 A.D. 975, 156 N.Y.S. 1148
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 15, 1915·Published
Opinion
Order reversed, with costs, and matter remitted to the Special Term for the appointment of commissioners of appraisal, upon the authority of Matter of Staub v. Village of Mamaroneck (165 App. Div. 755). A11 concurred, except Kruse, P. J., who dissented upon the grounds stated in his dissenting memorandum in the case of Matter of Lester v. Village of Blasdell (167 App. Div. 947).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Claim of Toomey v. Village of Blasdell, 171 A.D. 975, 156 N.Y.S. 1148 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1915).
171 A.D. 975 (Claim of Toomey v. Village of Blasdell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re the Claim of Staub against the Village of Mamaroneck
165 A.D. 755 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1915)
Claim of Lester v. Village of Blasdell
167 A.D. 947 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1915)