Claim of Toog v. Bialek

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Toog v. Bialek

248 A.D. 839, 290 N.Y.S. 165, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7571

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 23, 1936

StatusPublished

This text of 248 A.D. 839 (Claim of Toog v. Bialek) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Claim of Toog v. Bialek, 248 A.D. 839, 290 N.Y.S. 165, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7571 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

Claimant fell against bread-mixer machine, receiving injuries, including a broken jaw; his hands were caught in the revolving mechamsm of the mixer; his right hand was amputated; and he suffered eighty per cent loss of use of left hand; he lost eight teeth; left side of his face was flattened; there is an adherent scar at the angle of the jaw, and a functional injury to the left eye. He suffers from headache intermittently. The evidence sustains finding of seventy-five per cent loss of earning capacity.— Award unammously affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, MeNamee, Crapser and Bliss, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Claimant fell against bread-mixer machine, receiving injuries, including a broken jaw; his hands were caught in the revolving mechamsm of the mixer; his right hand was amputated; and he suffered eighty per cent loss of use of left hand; he lost eight teeth; left side of his face was flattened; there is an adherent scar at the angle of the jaw, and a functional injury to the left eye. He suffers from headache intermittently. The evidence sustains finding of seventy-five per cent loss of earning capacity.— Award unammously affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, MeNamee, Crapser and Bliss, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

248 A.D. 839, 290 N.Y.S. 165, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7571, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-toog-v-bialek-nyappdiv-1936.