Claim of Toog v. Bialek

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Toog v. Bialek

248 A.D. 839, 290 N.Y.S. 165, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7571

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 23, 1936·Published

Opinion

Claimant fell against bread-mixer machine, receiving injuries, including a broken jaw; his hands were caught in the revolving mechamsm of the mixer; his right hand was amputated; and he suffered eighty per cent loss of use of left hand; he lost eight teeth; left side of his face was flattened; there is an adherent scar at the angle of the jaw, and a functional injury to the left eye. He suffers from headache intermittently. The evidence sustains finding of seventy-five per cent loss of earning capacity.— Award unammously affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, MeNamee, Crapser and Bliss, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Claimant fell against bread-mixer machine, receiving injuries, including a broken jaw; his hands were caught in the revolving mechamsm of the mixer; his right hand was amputated; and he suffered eighty per cent loss of use of left hand; he lost eight teeth; left side of his face was flattened; there is an adherent scar at the angle of the jaw, and a functional injury to the left eye. He suffers from headache intermittently. The evidence sustains finding of seventy-five per cent loss of earning capacity.— Award unammously affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, MeNamee, Crapser and Bliss, JJ.

Claim of Toog v. Bialek, 248 A.D. 839, 290 N.Y.S. 165, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7571 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

248 A.D. 839 (Claim of Toog v. Bialek) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.